Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||6 June 2008|
|PDF File Size:||9.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial. The diary carries a certain hardness of thinking and problematizing what we do, because it confronts a meritocratic formation based on the error-correctness present in the pedagogical processes sedimented by the academic and professional formation that since the nineteenth century constitutes us.
The author as a protagonist The writing of a field naalisis from the perspective of lourai analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial.
They enter into the game of thinking the people, with their affections and knowledge, not to deny what was done, but to denature it by overflowing unprecedented limits. These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, anlaisis by the aanalisis of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary.
Analyzing our implications is a way of thinking of ourselves as the producers of relationships, in opposition to the movement that understands them as data from which we have to adjust.
We do not judge, we put it into analysis. Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation.
For this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary. No models to follow? It puts on the scene everything and everyone inxtitucional in writing emerges as participants, summoning them to contribute to the analysis through their speeches, practices or the bonds that the problematizations create.
Its wealth is not in teaching to do right or better, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Interrogations are the right tool of a field diary, the good company in a formation by keeping alive the thinking and the research as professional practices that do not exhaust and do not cease to make learning.
Therefore, the implication analysis is a permanent process of denaturalization of institutions. This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: In the face of the heterogeneity that characterizes the institutional work, the field diary carries out a relationship that has as a horizon the horizontality, the self-management.
The writing of the diary makes it possible to think about the daily gesture, the need to listen to other voices and bring power of refusal to the already given as certain.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective. From this perspective, writing a field diary is to construct reality by a certain discursive order and not a simple act of technical reproduction.
The analysis, which is based on the socio-analytical references, requires an exercise of onstitucional about the problems, the implications, understanding how they constitute us and lead our action. Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political. In this abyss the diary projects us when converted loudau an apprenticeship committed to thinking and feeling.
Diário de campo: autor como protagonista
Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice. Objectivity as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned in front of a record of something distant, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act. All between and Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Far from the determinism of judging such meanings, they are the ones that become the object of analysis and not the singular acts.
It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities and put into analysis in their implications. The protagonism of the author of the diary is in the conduct of something that may have been understood as a particular situation, an action of a professional or a team, but it becomes a social event and historically referenced, even when loaded with singularities, because it was the analysis of their own implications.
When a mother is judged by both the school staff and the tutelary council for not being in time to pick up her children because she stayed home watching television, a certainty is given: The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done. It is not a copy, reproduction or transcription, but the record of a way of seeing the life and circumstances that present themselves at the moment the practices occur.
Books by Rene Lourau (Author of مفاتيح علم الاجتماع)
Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, by feeling, by silence, by desire, and any element can participate. Faced with a grandmother who arrives at the council complaining that the child’s mother is negligent, the counselor, without any consultation with the mother for being taken by the urgency that the report provokes, issues responsibility for this grandmother.
In their speech “they do not know the history of people and they take any story as true”. Through this path, the disagreements in the working field emerge as analytical challenges and lead to the search for tools to intervene in ways throughout the professional ways takes place, in a collective exercise.
Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism. Foucault understands truth as a relation of power, differing from the act of looking at truth as something to be discovered and accepted, insofar as truth responds to a set of rules and procedures, which produce discourses. Paradoxes between the analisus and the criticism The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
Next, the mother comes to the board demanding the child back.