Resolución ENARGAS N°/ VISTO el Expediente ENARGAS N° , la Ley N° y su Decreto Reglamentario N° /92, la Resolución. Enargas (), “marco regulatorio de la industria de gas, ley no. ”, www. MarcoLegal/Ley_pdf (accessed October ). la democracia republicana, el derecho a la información y la ley de gas, porque son fijados monopólicamente (ley y cc).
|Published (Last):||15 December 2012|
|PDF File Size:||14.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.16 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Controversy Surrounding Price Hikes to Your Gas Bill, Explained
Ever since the announcement was made, tensions have done nothing but escalate. Another scandal surrounding utility bills.
The legal battle made it all the way to the Supreme Court, which determined the government had to backtrack with its increases, not because of the amount, but because it did not hold the public hearings required by law, aimed at informing the public about them.
He has also contributed to news sites such 2076 Infobae and Americas Quarterly.
In fact, Infobae reported that in a paper distributed in the past 224076, companies argue they should actually increase bills by percent to fully cover their costs. Share Salta Deputy Alfredo Olmedo was the only one to vote against the law.
Tarifa de gas: por unanimidad, la Corte anuló el aumento respecto de los usuarios residenciales
Last Friday, Energy Minister Javier Iguacel said that, ly top of the expected 30 percent increase that would be applied to gas bills around the country in October, users would have to additionally pony up for those production costs in 24 payments, starting in January Share The Cambiemos caucus in the Senate will probably pey to discuss stripping Cristina from her immunity, but it will all be for optics. Esta es la ley de gas. The legal arguments are different in this case, but the precedent where the government did not achieve a similar goal exists.
ldy Igual no puede afectar derecho constitucional de propiedad del usuario: Cristina Kirchner Will Not go to Prison. Otherwise, they say, the country would go back to implementing populist measures in the energy sector.
However, different news sites reported that numerous users have filed injunctions against the increases, arguing they violate the legal principles of non-retroactivity — i. 20476 their end, gas companies threatened to halt their investment in the sector if the government does not move forward with the measure, arguing their contracts are in US dollars.
Ever since, it has continued to hike prices twice a year, in April and October.
The government lost a legal battle against users over the first wave of gas increases inafter different organizations filed injunctions against what they considered to be disproportionate hikes. In fact, Sergio Mohadeb, a lawyer who gained popularity on social media by sharing legal tips for daily situation through his account Derecho en Zapatillasshared a standardized injunction for people to fill with their information, should they want to initiate legal actions against the state for its decision.
The government ended up holding the hearings and implementing the increases, but close to four months after its initial expectations.
Government representatives argue, in contrast, that the decision does go in accordance to law and anticipated they will fight back the injunctions in court: Share Justice Carlos Rosenkrantz was the only one to vote against updating the index.